Picture this: someone types "best project management tool for freelancers" into ChatGPT. Instead of pulling from its training data alone, it actually goes out, searches the web in real time, reads through pages, and comes back with specific recommendations and links. That's SearchGPT in action.
So what exactly is SearchGPT?
SearchGPT is OpenAI's web search capability built directly into ChatGPT. It lets the model browse the internet, pull in live information, and cite its sources with clickable links. Originally launched as a separate prototype, it's now woven into ChatGPT itself.
Before SearchGPT, ChatGPT could only work with what it learned during training. Its knowledge had a cutoff date, and anything that happened after that date was a blind spot. SearchGPT removed that limitation. Ask about today's news, a product launched last week, or current pricing for a SaaS tool, and ChatGPT can actually go find the answer.
The experience feels like talking to a very competent research assistant. You ask a question, it searches, reads, synthesizes, and gives you a clear answer with sources listed at the bottom.
Why should you care?
Because ChatGPT has hundreds of millions of users, and a growing chunk of them are using it instead of Google.
When someone uses SearchGPT to find a product or service, the results aren't ten blue links. It's usually a curated list of three to five recommendations with explanations for each. If your business makes that shortlist, you just earned a warm lead. If it doesn't, you weren't just ranked lower. You were absent from the conversation entirely.
Here's what makes it different from traditional search: the citation model. SearchGPT shows inline citations linking back to the original sources. This means there's still a path back to your website, but only if your content was selected as a source. The traffic opportunity is real, but it's concentrated. The top-cited sources get visits. Everyone else gets nothing.
How SearchGPT picks its sources
OpenAI hasn't published a detailed algorithm (nobody in AI search has), but observable patterns tell us a lot.
Freshness matters heavily. SearchGPT is actively crawling the web in real time, and it gravitates toward recent, up-to-date content. An article from 2022 about "best tools for freelancers" usually loses out to one published this year.
Content quality and specificity play a big role. Pages that directly answer the question being asked, with clear structure and concrete details, tend to get cited more often. Generic overview content gets skipped in favor of pages with genuine depth.
Domain authority still carries weight. Established publications, well-known review sites, and authoritative industry resources appear in citations more frequently than unknown blogs. But it's not a hard rule. Smaller sites with genuinely excellent content on a specific topic do show up.
And here's something worth noting: SearchGPT appears to give preference to content that includes specific data points, comparisons, and structured information like pricing tables or feature lists. The easier it is for the model to extract a clear, useful answer, the more likely your content gets picked.
The attribution challenge
One tricky aspect of SearchGPT is tracking its impact. When someone clicks a citation link, it shows up in your analytics, but it's not always clearly labeled as coming from ChatGPT. Some visits appear as direct traffic, making it hard to measure how much business SearchGPT is actually sending your way.
Tools like Mentionable help close this gap by tracking whether you're being cited across AI platforms, including ChatGPT, so you know your visibility status even when your analytics can't tell you.
The honest truth
SearchGPT is still maturing. Citation accuracy varies. Sometimes it surfaces outdated information despite having access to the live web. Sometimes it picks less authoritative sources over better ones.
But the trajectory is clear: more people are starting their product research inside ChatGPT rather than Google. Whether SearchGPT becomes the dominant search paradigm or just a major alternative, being visible in its results is already worth paying attention to.
